Audi A5 / S5 / RS5 Coupe & Cabrio (B9) Discussion forum for the B9 Audi A5, S5 and RS5 Coupe and Cabriolet 2018 model year and up

RS5, as quick as a Civic Type R?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-19-2018, 01:57 PM
  #1  
AudiWorld Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
NoMoreBMWs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 745
Received 52 Likes on 38 Posts
Default RS5, as quick as a Civic Type R?

https://www.caranddriver.com/feature...tning-lap-2018

It seems that the Hankooks were the goat here: the sport diff in Dynamic and Auto was just over-heating the tires.
Old 09-19-2018, 02:37 PM
  #2  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
ArvX147's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1,193
Received 36 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Weight is king on the track and the civic is wayyyyyy lighter with only 100 less HP.

RS5 is not a track car, as expected...
Old 09-19-2018, 02:42 PM
  #3  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
-=Hot|Ice=-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 1,012
Received 100 Likes on 63 Posts
Default

The RS5 is more of a really fast GT. Audi has admitted this already.
Old 09-19-2018, 03:38 PM
  #4  
AudiWorld Super User
 
JD15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: DFW
Posts: 2,979
Received 541 Likes on 362 Posts
Default

The bigger issue is that it's only 0.4s faster than the previous RS5.
Old 09-19-2018, 03:41 PM
  #5  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
ArvX147's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1,193
Received 36 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JD15
The bigger issue is that it's only 0.4s faster than the previous RS5.
That part I can throw totally on the tires. The fact that the RS5 doesn't (always) come with pss/ps4 or equivalent Conti offering is a tragedy and a huge oversight by Audi considering that stock equipment means everything to magazine reviews.
Old 09-19-2018, 03:47 PM
  #6  
AudiWorld Super User
 
JD15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: DFW
Posts: 2,979
Received 541 Likes on 362 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ArvX147
That part I can throw totally on the tires. The fact that the RS5 doesn't (always) come with pss/ps4 or equivalent Conti offering is a tragedy and a huge oversight by Audi considering that stock equipment means everything to magazine reviews.
A $90k GT certainly deserves better tires and not the Hankooks that Audi chose to save a few bucks. Something like the PS4 you mentioned would probably cut a few seconds off the lap time and would be worth the cost of better marketing.
Old 09-19-2018, 11:38 PM
  #7  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
-=Hot|Ice=-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 1,012
Received 100 Likes on 63 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JD15
The bigger issue is that it's only 0.4s faster than the previous RS5.
With the B9, I just don't see the RS5 really being worth it compared to the S5.
Old 09-20-2018, 05:32 AM
  #8  
AudiWorld Super User
 
JD15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: DFW
Posts: 2,979
Received 541 Likes on 362 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by -=Hot|Ice=-
With the B9, I just don't see the RS5 really being worth it compared to the S5.
Though not a true track car, Audi really should have equipped the RS5 to perform better on a track test. For comparison, the M4 and M2 were four seconds and three seconds faster, respectively.
Old 09-20-2018, 05:56 AM
  #9  
AudiWorld Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
NoMoreBMWs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 745
Received 52 Likes on 38 Posts
Default this..

Originally Posted by -=Hot|Ice=-
With the B9, I just don't see the RS5 really being worth it compared to the S5.
My E92 M3 was about 1.5 seconds slower around VIR. I know from fastestlaps.com (and seat of the pants) that if anything an S5 is a little quicker on a tight course. The RS5 is quite a premium for 1.5 seconds.

Two caveats:

1. In Europe, where you can use the RS5's straight line speed, it might make more sense.
2. Tires. The Hankooks make nice summer high speed touring tires, but PS4s would do better. But then again both the RS5 and S5 would be quicker on PS4s.

ArvX has it just about right here: the mass (and distribution of the mass) disqualifies the RS5 as a sports car. If I could live with a coupe I'd be looking at the new Supra with its 3300 pound curb weight and 50/50 weight distribution for less money than an S5. Having said that, there's no reason to believe that anyone here bought an RS5 thinking it was a sports car.

Last edited by NoMoreBMWs; 09-20-2018 at 06:45 AM.
Old 09-20-2018, 06:12 AM
  #10  
AudiWorld Member
 
McGriddle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

They say they weren't in Dynamic and used Individual instead to put the Diff into Comfort. However, shouldn't they have then dropped the transmission into "S" instead of "D?" You can clearly see the transmission is in "D" in the video on the lower right at about 2:48. Dynamic normally puts you into "S," but they used Individual. I haven't tried that in my own RS5 since I either use Dynamic or Auto in "S" mode. Does Individual with the Engine and Trans in Dynamic have no difference in throttle response in D versus S? I need to test that in my RS5.


Quick Reply: RS5, as quick as a Civic Type R?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:52 PM.