Software update for more range?
Even in 2029, Audi will be on a 125Kwh battery doing 286 miles vs the 2021 Lucid Air on a similar size battery doing 517 miles. LOL. Traditional automakers are dead in the water!
However, I'm not sure I agree with this 100%: the difference in weight is only really significant in start / stop situations (city) where ultimate range for a big SUV style car like the E-tron is least important. On the highway, the weight (+/- 100kg or so) has far less impact because wind resistance becomes a much bigger issue and you're not constantly accelerating / decelerating the car: you can coast a lot as well (the Audi philosophy which personally i prefer way more than using regen as a priority) and there again, weight isn't really disadvantageous.. You can play with ABRP to see this in action on any highway driving: the difference in energy usage for highway driving with an additional 100kg or so literally affects the total range by only about 1%.
I do agree that bigger battery adding more weight has a negative effect, but I still think as far as overall range is concerned, this ratio is only going to get better and better. If you're familiar with the "Tesla Bjorn" youtube channel he goes into this in some of his videos, in particular with the E-tron 50 vs 55 range where is shows that the weight savings of the smaller batter pack does indeed make a bit of a difference in range, but the larger battery still has a LOT more range then the smaller battery: i.e. a 70kwh battery might achieve 75% (not 70%) of the range of a 100kwh battery due to the weight reduction, but the bigger battery still has a lot more usable range. This is especially true when you want to keep the bottom end away from 0% state of charge and always ensure that you have 30km (20 miles) or so of "safety range": this eats into the total range and really reduces / eliminates the benefit from reduction in weight of the lighter battery pack.
Just throwing out thoughts

However, I'm not sure I agree with this 100%: the difference in weight is only really significant in start / stop situations (city) where ultimate range for a big SUV style car like the E-tron is least important. On the highway, the weight (+/- 100kg or so) has far less impact because wind resistance becomes a much bigger issue and you're not constantly accelerating / decelerating the car: you can coast a lot as well (the Audi philosophy which personally i prefer way more than using regen as a priority) and there again, weight isn't really disadvantageous.. You can play with ABRP to see this in action on any highway driving: the difference in energy usage for highway driving with an additional 100kg or so literally affects the total range by only about 1%.
I do agree that bigger battery adding more weight has a negative effect, but I still think as far as overall range is concerned, this ratio is only going to get better and better. If you're familiar with the "Tesla Bjorn" youtube channel he goes into this in some of his videos, in particular with the E-tron 50 vs 55 range where is shows that the weight savings of the smaller batter pack does indeed make a bit of a difference in range, but the larger battery still has a LOT more range then the smaller battery: i.e. a 70kwh battery might achieve 75% (not 70%) of the range of a 100kwh battery due to the weight reduction, but the bigger battery still has a lot more usable range. This is especially true when you want to keep the bottom end away from 0% state of charge and always ensure that you have 30km (20 miles) or so of "safety range": this eats into the total range and really reduces / eliminates the benefit from reduction in weight of the lighter battery pack.
Just throwing out thoughts

I don't know how you get much deeper pockets than Volkswagen group, except for the government, which may not be a bad idea, although I have not much more faith in them either.
Or, wait for Shell and Exxon to start replacing pumps with chargers and we should be alright.
Last edited by Jgreenle; Aug 15, 2020 at 03:57 PM.
I don't know how you get much deeper pockets than Volkswagen group, except for the government, which may not be a bad idea, although I have not much more faith in them either.
Or, wait for Shell and Exxon to start replacing pumps with chargers and we should be alright.
https://www.petro-canada.ca/en/perso...ectric-highway
a) It's cold (very cold this week), and I loose 25%-30% of my range in winter.
b) It's flat - so very little to no regeneration
c) No fast chargers along I-35 - Minneapolis to Des Moines, IA sports exactly ZERO fast chargers. One fast charge (Chargepoint) in Blue Earth, Minnesota. (And when that one is down for several weeks, until I reported it, that hurts). ZEF energy says they will be building fast chargers along I-35, but they haven't been built yet. Electrify America is a no show in this area.
So, as much as I love the car, the range is a deal breaker in the end for me. When the lease is up, I think I'm turning it in. I already have a deposit on a Lucid Air; hoping their range is as good as they say (even if I take a 25-30% range drop in winter, the range would be useable). There's also Tesla, and again, much better range.
If Audi could release what's on reserve on the battery to the user, it might make it just enough where I could justify keeping it (buy it off lease) or give it to my wife, who drives considerably less than I do.
Really too bad, I really do love the car itself. Too bad she's too heavy and has too small a battery. Turns out range anxiety is not anxiety at all, it is real.
I love the car, but the range is poor in my neck of the woods: Southern Minnesota
a) It's cold (very cold this week), and I loose 25%-30% of my range in winter.
b) It's flat - so very little to no regeneration
c) No fast chargers along I-35 - Minneapolis to Des Moines, IA sports exactly ZERO fast chargers. One fast charge (Chargepoint) in Blue Earth, Minnesota. (And when that one is down for several weeks, until I reported it, that hurts). ZEF energy says they will be building fast chargers along I-35, but they haven't been built yet. Electrify America is a no show in this area.
So, as much as I love the car, the range is a deal breaker in the end for me. When the lease is up, I think I'm turning it in. I already have a deposit on a Lucid Air; hoping their range is as good as they say (even if I take a 25-30% range drop in winter, the range would be useable). There's also Tesla, and again, much better range.
If Audi could release what's on reserve on the battery to the user, it might make it just enough where I could justify keeping it (buy it off lease) or give it to my wife, who drives considerably less than I do.
Really too bad, I really do love the car itself. Too bad she's too heavy and has too small a battery. Turns out range anxiety is not anxiety at all, it is real.
Audi can't realistically release the reserve on the battery without drastically shortening the batteries life. Maybe a tweak of a few percent at most. So I wouldn't expect this to solve your problem.
An electric will be more convenient if and only if you can mostly charge at home. Even the best QC stops are less than ideal. So if you need more, you need more.
https://www.plugshare.com/location/286264
125 kW dual chargers at about the half way point. Looks very usable. Dec 6, 2020 was first charge, so is new.
https://www.plugshare.com/location/252835
https://www.plugshare.com/location/287016
and coming soon:
https://www.plugshare.com/location/252836
Last edited by WetEV; Feb 9, 2021 at 08:29 AM. Reason: typo
Bringing Audi to Life for Audi Fans
Also, our range was about 30% drop in the cold (-5F to 0F). Cruise set at 72, front heat only (no rear) set to A/C ECO and 68F and charged to 100% we were getting consistently 140 miles per charge estimate and it seemed pretty accurate when we would use almost the whole charge between stations. At 140 mile range, it's tough to get anywhere in a timely fashion even with DCFCs.
Also, our range was about 30% drop in the cold (-5F to 0F). Cruise set at 72, front heat only (no rear) set to A/C ECO and 68F and charged to 100% we were getting consistently 140 miles per charge estimate and it seemed pretty accurate when we would use almost the whole charge between stations. At 140 mile range, it's tough to get anywhere in a timely fashion even with DCFCs.






