Just done next initial stage run.
10-17-2004, 08:57 PM
#12
Elder Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 14,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
12.7 at 109, you can read about it in this months issue of European Car
this was in 100 temps with 15 mph head winds at 1600 ft. You can see how bad the conditions were by the times the other cars ran. Paul should run high 14's to low 15's and had problems just getting into the 15's most of the time hitting 16's. The highest powered cars making 400-430 whp were running 14's and dipped down to 13.7-13.8 on one of their runs.
My other traps before that day were in the 112-114 range.
My other traps before that day were in the 112-114 range.
10-17-2004, 09:07 PM
#14
Elder Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 14,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What does his et have to do with anything.
We dont run at the same track so the 2 et's cant be compared. Last time I checked 2 cars raced on the same track to figure out who was faster, not at different tracks with different conditions.
BTW why dont you look at his times with his stock trans, which were in the 13's till he put in the S4 gear box.
BTW why dont you look at his times with his stock trans, which were in the 13's till he put in the S4 gear box.
10-17-2004, 09:14 PM
#17
Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,614
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i am not sure that 1/4 mile times are comparable unless they are run in the same place at the same
time there are too many different variables that can cause variations. i have seen mike's car in action and can assure you that it is no joke. after all he did best a 430whp TT by a full second on the same day in the same conditions (after mike had just put down 370whp)
10-17-2004, 09:18 PM
#18
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1/4 times are also driver dependant and every dyno is different too.
A fair comparison is never goign to happen.
No doubt both cars are fast .. but so far Lucas has gone from A to B quicker than Mike regardless of HP.
No doubt both cars are fast .. but so far Lucas has gone from A to B quicker than Mike regardless of HP.
10-17-2004, 09:21 PM
#20
AudiWorld Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I ran 12.1 on only 300hp at wheels Gee Damn Mike cant you get any quicker.
Why mike do you constantly have to try and make out you have something better than every one else?
Ages ago when you did set a quick time with K-03 or K04 was it, you put down dyno figures and dismissed them and said only track results are valid.
Now you have a new setup, and you track results dont reflect your dyno numbers, Now you go on about every one is at a faster track, you always race on the slowest, on and on and on.
Then you make comments on valave train, **** man, mine was still making power when operator lifter off at 7500 rpm.
Well Mike what you want to set as a Bench mark then?
Dyno Figures? 1/4 mile result? what????
**** man 12.7, I could probably do that with one spark plug taken out.
Ages ago when you did set a quick time with K-03 or K04 was it, you put down dyno figures and dismissed them and said only track results are valid.
Now you have a new setup, and you track results dont reflect your dyno numbers, Now you go on about every one is at a faster track, you always race on the slowest, on and on and on.
Then you make comments on valave train, **** man, mine was still making power when operator lifter off at 7500 rpm.
Well Mike what you want to set as a Bench mark then?
Dyno Figures? 1/4 mile result? what????
**** man 12.7, I could probably do that with one spark plug taken out.