would there be any interest in a Side mounted "Air to Water" Intercooler for the A4 1.8t?
#1
would there be any interest in a Side mounted "Air to Water" Intercooler for the A4 1.8t?
im currently working on a project to replace my FMIC that was damaged in an accident. i decided to go with an air/water I/C because of its compact size & increased performance abilities.
i was wonedring if there was any interest in a "Kit" that would include a water pump, heat exchanger, reseviour, hoses & all the needed hardware... it would probably retail for around 1400$ or so...
let me know what you guys think, im open to ideas
i was wonedring if there was any interest in a "Kit" that would include a water pump, heat exchanger, reseviour, hoses & all the needed hardware... it would probably retail for around 1400$ or so...
let me know what you guys think, im open to ideas
#2
here's a link with some more info on "Air to Water" Intercoolers
<ul><li><a href="http://www.autospeed.com/A_0090/page1.html">http://www.autospeed.com/A_0090/page1.html</a</li></ul>
#4
Not exactly true.....
Drag racers usually ice down the water supply in their water/air IC systems. This provides a HUGE benefit, dropping the intake charge below ambient temps, but it's very short-lived.
The heat-extraction ability of water is far superior to air, and if a system is designed with enough of a water reservoir, then there should be no problems.
The main drawback is the added complexity of running lines, a pump, coolant reservoir, and a water radiator, and trying to get it all to fit.
The heat-extraction ability of water is far superior to air, and if a system is designed with enough of a water reservoir, then there should be no problems.
The main drawback is the added complexity of running lines, a pump, coolant reservoir, and a water radiator, and trying to get it all to fit.
Trending Topics
#10
Being an engineer I can tell you that seldom is the best ....
engineering solution the best company solution.
I don't think your point is valid on that basis. Also, the water-air intercooler can be superior in most low speed (under 60)applications if correctly engineered.
The trade off is extra weight and complexity. Packaging convenience may also dictate water-air.
I don't think your point is valid on that basis. Also, the water-air intercooler can be superior in most low speed (under 60)applications if correctly engineered.
The trade off is extra weight and complexity. Packaging convenience may also dictate water-air.