Q5/SQ5 MKI (8R) Discussion Discussion forum for the First Generation Audi Q5 SUV produced from 2008 to 2017

EPA is unreasonable...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-22-2016, 05:57 AM
  #1  
AudiWorld Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
soonerfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 766
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default EPA is unreasonable...

Now it seems they want VAG to build EV's in the USA and install charging stations across the US as part of the agreement to the NOx debacle.

How about just agreeing to a remedy of the NOx emissions first and allowing us hapless owners of the vehicles get out of "limbo"?

Old 02-22-2016, 06:18 AM
  #2  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
Don Keener's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 643
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Well... if they do that in lieu of a monetary fine... then that sounds like a great idea. The fine would be to promote EV and bring jobs into the US instead of lining the governments pockets.
Old 02-22-2016, 06:25 AM
  #3  
AudiWorld Member
 
A4rooster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 186
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Yeah, on the surface this could be a win-win solution for all, no?
Old 02-22-2016, 06:27 AM
  #4  
AudiWorld Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
soonerfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 766
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Don Keener
Well... if they do that in lieu of a monetary fine... then that sounds like a great idea. The fine would be to promote EV and bring jobs into the US instead of lining the governments pockets.
Agree 100%, but we TDI owners are virtually handcuffed until our vehicles are "cured" or bought back by VAG.
Old 02-22-2016, 06:40 AM
  #5  
AudiWorld Member
 
Deckardk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: St. George, UT
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Don Keener
Well... if they do that in lieu of a monetary fine... then that sounds like a great idea. The fine would be to promote EV and bring jobs into the US instead of lining the governments pockets.
Couldn't disagree more.

If it was VW pushing this arrangement, fine. But for the EPA to mandate this as part of any settlement is government overreach, pure and simple.

Told you folks the EPA couldn't be trusted.
Old 02-22-2016, 06:41 AM
  #6  
AudiWorld Member
 
Deckardk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: St. George, UT
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by A4rooster
Yeah, on the surface this could be a win-win solution for all, no?
So the means justify the end? This isn't government' role.
Old 02-22-2016, 06:50 AM
  #7  
AudiWorld Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
soonerfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 766
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Deckardk
Couldn't disagree more.

If it was VW pushing this arrangement, fine. But for the EPA to mandate this as part of any settlement is government overreach, pure and simple.

Told you folks the EPA couldn't be trusted.
We TDI owners are victims of both entities. It's like being a child in a very messy, punitive divorce.
Old 02-22-2016, 06:57 AM
  #8  
AudiWorld Member
 
Deckardk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: St. George, UT
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

^ Exactly. And if the EPA tries to ram this up VW's ***, VW could counter-sue... and win, but not before it goes before the Supremes in a couple of years.
Old 02-22-2016, 07:01 AM
  #9  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
Don Keener's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 643
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Deckardk
^ Exactly. And if the EPA tries to ram this up VW's ***, VW could counter-sue... and win, but not before it goes before the Supremes in a couple of years.
I do see your point... They could give VAG a choice... pay the 'fine' in dollars or by investment in America. VAG could get off easier for the latter as it would make the 'fine' work on their behalf for the future and get a LOT of goodwill.
Old 02-22-2016, 07:23 AM
  #10  
AudiWorld Member
 
Deckardk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: St. George, UT
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Don Keener
I do see your point... They could give VAG a choice... pay the 'fine' in dollars or by investment in America. VAG could get off easier for the latter as it would make the 'fine' work on their behalf for the future and get a LOT of goodwill.
It’s not within the EPA's purview. But let's imagine for a moment this green agreement playing out. What happens in the long run? In my head, I'm already envisioning the future news reports about how the do-gooder's good intentions backfired.

Government screws up pretty much everything, and nothing will ever convince me that the EPA' proposal is a good idea.

And here's the other thing. Let's say they reach an impass and VW sues. If the EPA has demonstrated in the negotiations that VW's proposed fix will solve the problem, VW might move forward with a fix without the EPA's appoval while the suit moves forward. Wild speculation to be sure, but anything is possible with these two.


Quick Reply: EPA is unreasonable...



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:50 AM.