I have not done this in a long time...
06-18-2008, 11:21 PM
#1
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 6,741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have not done this in a long time...
It's still my favorite...
<img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v620/Carrera1981/RS4_618_001_1024.jpg">
Long day and a ton of pics to go through. Will post more later on.
<img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v620/Carrera1981/RS4_618_001_1024.jpg">
Long day and a ton of pics to go through. Will post more later on.
06-19-2008, 10:36 AM
#7
AudiWorld Super User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Its a very wide angle shot. It's going to have a fair amount of distortion regardless of equipment.
Just out of curiosity... what was this shot with?
I need to pick up some wider glass. Thanks.
I need to pick up some wider glass. Thanks.
Trending Topics
06-19-2008, 11:29 AM
#9
AudiWorld Super User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
nice. I will probably do a similar setup when the next 5D comes out (hopefully soon). For now...
I need to find something wider than 16mm for on my 1.6x crop body.
Do you like that combo?
Thanks for the info.
Do you like that combo?
Thanks for the info.
06-19-2008, 11:47 AM
#10
AudiWorld Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would keep the camera. :)
And throw away lens only, which is 1.5K only. 
No matter how expensive it is there's still a limit of what you can do with it.
By looking at the distortion here:
http://www.photozone.de/Reviews/Canon%20EOS%20Lens%20Tests/175-canon-ef-16-35mm-f28-usm-l-lab-test-report--review?start=1
I would try not to use 16 and step back with at least 18mm. It's not going to be as wide, but at least the key part of the picture would look right.
I apologize for being overreactive. It was just painful for me to look at the distorted beauty.
No matter how expensive it is there's still a limit of what you can do with it.
By looking at the distortion here:
http://www.photozone.de/Reviews/Canon%20EOS%20Lens%20Tests/175-canon-ef-16-35mm-f28-usm-l-lab-test-report--review?start=1
I would try not to use 16 and step back with at least 18mm. It's not going to be as wide, but at least the key part of the picture would look right.
I apologize for being overreactive. It was just painful for me to look at the distorted beauty.