S4 / RS4 (B5 Platform) Discussion Discussion forum for the B5 Audi S4 & RS4 produced from 1998-2002

"Safest" chip... (flame suit on)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-18-2001, 11:41 AM
  #21  
AudiWorld Super User
 
Mike S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 15,447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default More BS from System_S4000!

Have you taken the time to contact KKK in Hanover? As posted two years ago, I spent two hours at the KKK factory back in July of 2000, and photographing their facility for their annual report. I even had lunch with their Director of Public relations and two engineers, in their cafeteria. I deliverately asked this question, as I was considering chipping my S4. I was informed that under the proper conditions (no oil starvation, enough heat dissipation, ect), that KKK K03's can handle continuous a continuos 1.3bar. They can even handle 1.5 bar spikes. I was also informed that cool down and warm up, are exceedingly important (duh!) and that appropriate oil selection has a ton to do with warm up damage.

I am sure APR, GIAC, MTM, ABT and many others all have the KKK K03 specs, something you undoubtedly do not have!


Mike S
Old 12-18-2001, 11:44 AM
  #22  
AudiWorld Super User
 
System_S4k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 18,111
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I guess we will find out when chipped S4's start hitting 100,000 miles...
Old 12-18-2001, 11:47 AM
  #23  
Elder Member
 
George @ BostonAudi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 15,742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default They may or may not. Fact is at .7 bar, they WILL EVENTUALLY BLOW.

Thats just the way it is. Turbos fail. Its an absolute guarantee. And arguing that chipping won't make it happen faster is completely rediculous.
Old 12-18-2001, 11:48 AM
  #24  
Member
 
esfor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default let me try to answer your question

in the old-turbo-part-number days, there was speculation that turbos were blowing because of being overworked at high altitude. Supposedly, the MTM generation II chip addressed this problem by reducing boost at high RPMs. I am no expert on chips but my take is that the MTM gen II chip would be easier on your turbos than other chips which make more power.

-Alex
Old 12-18-2001, 11:48 AM
  #25  
AudiWorld Super User
 
System_S4k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 18,111
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Your saying that if you chip your car....

that your turbos will NOT blow? Your saying chipping your car won't even increase your chances of blowing your turbos? Your saying that a chipped S4's turbos will last as long as stock turbos?
Old 12-18-2001, 11:50 AM
  #26  
AudiWorld Super User
 
System_S4k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 18,111
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Agreed.
Old 12-18-2001, 11:51 AM
  #27  
New Member
Thread Starter
 
nfoboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Wow! An actual answer to the question. Thanks!

Not that I mind the debate, but I really would like to know the "safest" option. Not just "keep your chip if you're not prepared."

If I do chip, I will be prepared, but I also think that minimizing the strain is prudent for my approach to chipping.

Ross
Old 12-18-2001, 12:16 PM
  #28  
Junior Member
 
geoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default EVERYTHING fails eventually.....

Every part on a vehicle has an average lifecycle. Theoretically, chipping WILL cause them to fail sooner than they would fail running stock boost. Whether that is at 50k miles or 500k miles only the manufacturer knows.

We could argue about how coilovers will cause suspension components (arms, bushing, etc.) to fail prematurely too....

The reason AOA attempts to combat chipping is because turbos are a lot more expensive to replace than bushings are.

The bottom line is no one here has any proof or factual data showing chipping correlates to a significant reduction in turbo life. And no, a very rough "chip survey" conducted by enthusiasts here is hardly enough to call valid.
Old 12-18-2001, 12:20 PM
  #29  
Member
 
Toy_Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,636
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Factors affecting turbocharger service life

I found this page somewhat informative. Note how it mentions overspeeding at high altitudes, etc.<ul><li><a href="http://www.treasurestate.com/diesel/turbo4.htm">http://www.treasurestate.com/diesel/turbo4.htm</a</li></ul>
Old 12-18-2001, 12:25 PM
  #30  
Junior Member
 
baldmike73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I am planning on going w/Neuspeed. not as much boost, but easier on turbos. stiil adds 55hp/65lbs


Quick Reply: "Safest" chip... (flame suit on)



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:45 PM.