How accurate is the Gtech thingy......
#1
AudiWorld Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How accurate is the Gtech thingy......
these are the numbers It read after a quick little run....
0-60......5.43
1/4 mi....13.96 @ 106.5MPH
Just wondering if this thing is accurate....I didnt really launch the car hard at all.
0-60......5.43
1/4 mi....13.96 @ 106.5MPH
Just wondering if this thing is accurate....I didnt really launch the car hard at all.
#3
AudiWorld Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I just looked at it.....
The one I have isn't tested... The one I have is the Gtech performance meter/pro ....
it looks different and it was only $50 or around there.
it looks different and it was only $50 or around there.
#4
I've had good 0-60 reads on the one you are talking about
I bought one for my dad like 4+years ago, and it's worked really good.
2001 S4 Avant MTM stage II to be determined, picking up on saturday ; )
Chipped 2001 1.8t Avant (mine sold)- 6.6-6.7 (close to where it should be)
1999 Pontiac Grand AM (sis)- 6.7ish (faster than you think)
1997 Ford Contour SE (mine deceased)- I forget but I'll say 7.2 is sticking in my head
1998 BMW M3 (dad current)- 5.7-5.8 (listed 5.5-5.6)
2003 BMW M5 (dad current) - 5.2 (on winter NE Roads)had more. (lised 4.8 or 5.0, not sure)
Def. Use it as a comparison, not as an end all of end all. But we've gotten pretty close to where we should be on all accounts. And don't really set out to get the lowest time. Really only tested each car once or twice, so with practice times could get better.
2001 S4 Avant MTM stage II to be determined, picking up on saturday ; )
Chipped 2001 1.8t Avant (mine sold)- 6.6-6.7 (close to where it should be)
1999 Pontiac Grand AM (sis)- 6.7ish (faster than you think)
1997 Ford Contour SE (mine deceased)- I forget but I'll say 7.2 is sticking in my head
1998 BMW M3 (dad current)- 5.7-5.8 (listed 5.5-5.6)
2003 BMW M5 (dad current) - 5.2 (on winter NE Roads)had more. (lised 4.8 or 5.0, not sure)
Def. Use it as a comparison, not as an end all of end all. But we've gotten pretty close to where we should be on all accounts. And don't really set out to get the lowest time. Really only tested each car once or twice, so with practice times could get better.
#6
AudiWorld Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thanks......I probably won't do it that much......
just wanted to test it out....
I think I want to take it to the track this summer and maybe do a 1/4....so this is a good practice......
I wish I could practice more, but I can't afford the clutch or turbos to go any time soon..
I think I want to take it to the track this summer and maybe do a 1/4....so this is a good practice......
I wish I could practice more, but I can't afford the clutch or turbos to go any time soon..
#7
Your trap speed is way too high. Otherwise it's probably ok if you use it correctly. Here is my
review.<ul><li><a href="https://forums.audiworld.com/s4/msgs/1876562.phtml">Click for my impressions...</a></li></ul>
Trending Topics
#8
Think you could scan it and email it to me sir? I cannot get C&D over here. :-(
Also, email me a list of those rackets you were interested in. I'll get you some prices.
Thanks Dan.
Thanks Dan.
#9
Doh, I gave all the magazines away but I'll try to get that one back...
...it tests most of the current accelerometers on the market vs. a local drag strip and the results for most of the were excellent when properly adjusted.
Regarding the rackets, no worries, I'm all set, thanks. :-)
Regarding the rackets, no worries, I'm all set, thanks. :-)