how could ramair lead to lower airflow readings?...
08-24-2004, 12:01 AM
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
how could ramair lead to lower airflow readings?...
I see posts of the stock panel filter getting higher g/s readings than with a cone filter. Why is this?
I think I may be seeing a similar issue when i would run my ramair. I saw a loss of flow over the evo intake, but I know the air was colder and freer flowing.
I would like to know what has to be done to get proper readings.
I think I may be seeing a similar issue when i would run my ramair. I saw a loss of flow over the evo intake, but I know the air was colder and freer flowing.
I would like to know what has to be done to get proper readings.
08-24-2004, 01:58 AM
#5
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well I use a tube that matches up evenly to the maf...
I used a 3.25" tube. with a large itg filter. The path to the maf is very direct. there is about a 8" long straight section before entry to the housing.
shouldnt this long path make airflow more accurate?
shouldnt this long path make airflow more accurate?
08-24-2004, 06:04 AM
#7
Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When I tested my S-flo is was logging at 280 gps. Too bad it didn't ...
add ANY POWER. The high numbers are caused by turbulence. The FATS test showed no improvement in power.
That is all.
That is all.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
thewatcher101
A4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
8
05-21-2007 04:46 AM
Mark P
S4 / RS4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
13
04-05-2006 05:12 AM
AddictedA4
A4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
16
06-05-2003 05:09 AM
bigalk (back in UK)
12v V6 Discussion
14
04-02-2003 07:45 PM
Agent Orange
S4 / RS4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
12
06-07-2002 06:08 AM