Mark@ASP, PSmalls, more logs tonight
#1
AudiWorld Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mark@ASP, PSmalls, more logs tonight
Tonight with stock intake w/ D-holes in bottom of box
ASP Stage 3
3/4 Tank of 91 Octane
me = 223 lbs mmmmm cheeseburger
Temp ~ 63 F
Altitude ~ 6200 ft above sea level
Logs done both directions and same location as Monday
Everything looks much more in harmony (Higher MAF, increase in timing advance, O2 ~ Stoichiometric) except Fats average .22 seconds higher than w/ open element intake. Mean = 4.33 seconds. Given all variables, horsepower decreased. Should have increased, yes?
2ndary 02's deleted
Wednesday,25,October,2006,20:06:43
8D0 907 551 M,,AutoSpeed Stage3G _____,
Group A:,'003 Group B:'031 Group C:,'115
RPM,Mass Flow Load Ign. Timing Voltage Voltage RPM Load Absolute Pres. Absolute
STAMP/min g/s BTDC STAMP V V STAMP/min % mbar mbar
2.19 3360 175.06 8.3 2.50 0.830 0.835 1.90 3160 145.1 2220.0 1950.0
3.11 4000 180.11 -0.8 3.41 0.855 0.860 2.80 3800 175.2 2190.0 2470.0
4.04 4560 226.78 16.0 4.36 0.860 0.865 3.72 4360 160.2 2320.0 2190.0
5.03 5160 244.64 13.8 5.37 0.870 0.880 4.69 4960 161.7 2350.0 2290.0
6.08 5720 256.19 8.3 6.44 0.885 0.885 5.73 5560 160.2 2350.0 2280.0
7.18 6240 258.75 11.3 7.56 0.895 0.895 6.81 6080 148.9 2350.0 2220.0
5.58 4200 190.92 5.3 4.88 0.850 0.845 5.27 4000 166.2 2310.0 2370.0
6.53 4760 230.83 3.8 5.90 0.850 0.855 6.22 4560 165.4 2330.0 2300.0
7.56 5360 252.14 11.3 6.86 0.860 0.870 7.20 5160 165.4 2350.0 2290.0
8.63 5920 269.00 12.8 7.91 0.865 0.870 8.25 5720 157.1 2350.0 2270.0
9.73 6480 266.08 18.0 8.98 0.870 0.875 9.36 6280 145.1 2350.0 2190.0
3.20 3880 182.86 10.5 3.50 0.845 0.850 2.90 3680 178.2 2190.0 2500.0
4.13 4440 226.33 9.0 4.45 0.850 0.855 3.81 4240 157.9 2320.0 2160.0
5.10 5080 240.97 3.8 5.44 0.860 0.865 4.77 4840 160.2 2340.0 2280.0
6.14 5560 258.28 7.5 6.50 0.870 0.875 5.79 5400 161.7 2350.0 2340.0
7.23 6120 266.56 10.5 7.60 0.880 0.885 6.86 5920 153.4 2350.0 2280.0
8.36 6600 260.47 19.5 8.75 0.885 0.895 7.98 6440 138.3 2350.0 2210.0
Wednesday,25,October,2006,20:17:56
8D0 907 551 M,,AutoSpeed Stage3G _____,
,Group A:,'003
RPM,Mass Flow,Load,Ign. Timing
STAMP/min g/s % °BTDC
0.30 4080 176.31 100.0 3.0
0.60 4240 206.50 100.0 3.8
0.92 4440 207.97 100.0 1.5
1.23 4600 202.19 100.0 3.8
1.57 4840 212.53 100.0 5.3
1.89 5000 229.81 100.0 2.3
2.23 5240 241.94 100.0 9.0
2.58 5400 242.44 100.0 9.0
2.94 5640 248.42 100.0 9.8
3.29 5800 253.86 100.0 8.3
3.65 6000 250.92 100.0 9.8
4.02 6160 257.31 100.0 13.5
4.40 6360 249.42 100.0 14.3
4.78 6520 249.81 100.0 13.5
5.15 6680 249.81 100.0 18.8
9.64 4080 170.94 100.0 7.5
9.95 4280 204.08 100.0 9.0
0.28 4480 217.69 100.0 7.5
0.60 4680 222.17 100.0 8.3
0.93 4880 225.14 100.0 10.5
1.25 5080 234.25 100.0 9.0
1.60 5240 249.42 100.0 7.5
1.95 5440 246.53 100.0 11.3
2.30 5640 252.14 100.0 11.3
2.65 5840 242.94 100.0 11.3
3.02 6000 261.67 100.0 13.5
3.39 6160 250.42 100.0 14.3
3.77 6320 253.36 100.0 15.8
4.14 6520 254.67 100.0 16.5
ASP Stage 3
3/4 Tank of 91 Octane
me = 223 lbs mmmmm cheeseburger
Temp ~ 63 F
Altitude ~ 6200 ft above sea level
Logs done both directions and same location as Monday
Everything looks much more in harmony (Higher MAF, increase in timing advance, O2 ~ Stoichiometric) except Fats average .22 seconds higher than w/ open element intake. Mean = 4.33 seconds. Given all variables, horsepower decreased. Should have increased, yes?
2ndary 02's deleted
Wednesday,25,October,2006,20:06:43
8D0 907 551 M,,AutoSpeed Stage3G _____,
Group A:,'003 Group B:'031 Group C:,'115
RPM,Mass Flow Load Ign. Timing Voltage Voltage RPM Load Absolute Pres. Absolute
STAMP/min g/s BTDC STAMP V V STAMP/min % mbar mbar
2.19 3360 175.06 8.3 2.50 0.830 0.835 1.90 3160 145.1 2220.0 1950.0
3.11 4000 180.11 -0.8 3.41 0.855 0.860 2.80 3800 175.2 2190.0 2470.0
4.04 4560 226.78 16.0 4.36 0.860 0.865 3.72 4360 160.2 2320.0 2190.0
5.03 5160 244.64 13.8 5.37 0.870 0.880 4.69 4960 161.7 2350.0 2290.0
6.08 5720 256.19 8.3 6.44 0.885 0.885 5.73 5560 160.2 2350.0 2280.0
7.18 6240 258.75 11.3 7.56 0.895 0.895 6.81 6080 148.9 2350.0 2220.0
5.58 4200 190.92 5.3 4.88 0.850 0.845 5.27 4000 166.2 2310.0 2370.0
6.53 4760 230.83 3.8 5.90 0.850 0.855 6.22 4560 165.4 2330.0 2300.0
7.56 5360 252.14 11.3 6.86 0.860 0.870 7.20 5160 165.4 2350.0 2290.0
8.63 5920 269.00 12.8 7.91 0.865 0.870 8.25 5720 157.1 2350.0 2270.0
9.73 6480 266.08 18.0 8.98 0.870 0.875 9.36 6280 145.1 2350.0 2190.0
3.20 3880 182.86 10.5 3.50 0.845 0.850 2.90 3680 178.2 2190.0 2500.0
4.13 4440 226.33 9.0 4.45 0.850 0.855 3.81 4240 157.9 2320.0 2160.0
5.10 5080 240.97 3.8 5.44 0.860 0.865 4.77 4840 160.2 2340.0 2280.0
6.14 5560 258.28 7.5 6.50 0.870 0.875 5.79 5400 161.7 2350.0 2340.0
7.23 6120 266.56 10.5 7.60 0.880 0.885 6.86 5920 153.4 2350.0 2280.0
8.36 6600 260.47 19.5 8.75 0.885 0.895 7.98 6440 138.3 2350.0 2210.0
Wednesday,25,October,2006,20:17:56
8D0 907 551 M,,AutoSpeed Stage3G _____,
,Group A:,'003
RPM,Mass Flow,Load,Ign. Timing
STAMP/min g/s % °BTDC
0.30 4080 176.31 100.0 3.0
0.60 4240 206.50 100.0 3.8
0.92 4440 207.97 100.0 1.5
1.23 4600 202.19 100.0 3.8
1.57 4840 212.53 100.0 5.3
1.89 5000 229.81 100.0 2.3
2.23 5240 241.94 100.0 9.0
2.58 5400 242.44 100.0 9.0
2.94 5640 248.42 100.0 9.8
3.29 5800 253.86 100.0 8.3
3.65 6000 250.92 100.0 9.8
4.02 6160 257.31 100.0 13.5
4.40 6360 249.42 100.0 14.3
4.78 6520 249.81 100.0 13.5
5.15 6680 249.81 100.0 18.8
9.64 4080 170.94 100.0 7.5
9.95 4280 204.08 100.0 9.0
0.28 4480 217.69 100.0 7.5
0.60 4680 222.17 100.0 8.3
0.93 4880 225.14 100.0 10.5
1.25 5080 234.25 100.0 9.0
1.60 5240 249.42 100.0 7.5
1.95 5440 246.53 100.0 11.3
2.30 5640 252.14 100.0 11.3
2.65 5840 242.94 100.0 11.3
3.02 6000 261.67 100.0 13.5
3.39 6160 250.42 100.0 14.3
3.77 6320 253.36 100.0 15.8
4.14 6520 254.67 100.0 16.5
#2
not necessarily.....logs look better, though FATs may be slower......
it could be because you are "richer" than when you were prob running lean/er with Open element. Leaner i believe will be slightly faster.....but not safer. Your O2s look more in the safe range, esp on 91 Octane
Trending Topics
#9
AudiWorld Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Perhaps after the Top Ramen I'll be eating for the next two weeks....
I'll pick up ECUx. I don't know much about it, but price isn't too bad. Still have to use Ross-Tech cable?
More info on ASP so far: Cleared misfires from Monday morning. No new codes. Car is smooth as silk.
More info on ASP so far: Cleared misfires from Monday morning. No new codes. Car is smooth as silk.
#10
I use my Ross-Tech Key-USB cable for ECUx, same port as VAG-Com.
Once you get the ECUx working, all you need to do is download Mark P's group file (list of variables to log) and you're set!
healthy meals > mods for the S4
healthy meals > mods for the S4