Q7 MKII Discussion Discussion forum for the Audi Q7 MKII built from 2016 -

Q7 2.0t First Impressions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-16-2017, 06:15 AM
  #1  
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
 
SYMAWD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4,817
Likes: 0
Received 234 Likes on 171 Posts
Default Q7 2.0t First Impressions

Just got them in today. Around town it is perfectly fine and more than adequate. At highway speeds passing power is a little lacking but still adequate. Engine noise is more pronounced especially above 2,500 RPM but is fine when just cruising. Overall, I think it will sell well, it's just that I'm so used to driving the 3.0t. I experience the same with the Q5. The 2.0t is what almost everyone buys, but since I have a 3.0t the difference is way more obvious to me. First time Q7 buyers will find it fine. Existing Q7 owners likely wouldn't go for it.
Old 01-16-2017, 06:42 AM
  #2  
AudiWorld Member
 
ocean1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 271
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SYMAWD
Just got them in today. Around town it is perfectly fine and more than adequate. At highway speeds passing power is a little lacking but still adequate. Engine noise is more pronounced especially above 2,500 RPM but is fine when just cruising. Overall, I think it will sell well, it's just that I'm so used to driving the 3.0t. I experience the same with the Q5. The 2.0t is what almost everyone buys, but since I have a 3.0t the difference is way more obvious to me. First time Q7 buyers will find it fine. Existing Q7 owners likely wouldn't go for it.
Thanks for this. Wondering more if it is a very similar experience to the Q5 2.0t which I have. The new 2.0t in the Q7 has more power but the Q7 is heavier. Was hoping that would balance out and that I could expect the same experience as my Q5 which I would be fine with.
Old 01-16-2017, 11:07 AM
  #3  
AudiWorld Super User
 
BigKutta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Washington DC burbs
Posts: 2,630
Received 39 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

A 4 cylinder is just not adequate in this size/class. I tested the MB diesel 4, and it was downright sluggish and loud...and hence discontinued in the GLE I believe. But at the price discount it should still sell. I'll bet the fuel savings in the 2.0 vs the 3.0 are minimal to none because the 3.0 will be more efficient at moving this monster
Old 01-16-2017, 11:12 AM
  #4  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
Bozman5000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Tampa Bay Area
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

It doesn't save much gas.

2017 Audi Q7 2.0T Priced ? News ? Car and Driver | Car and Driver Blog
Old 01-16-2017, 01:44 PM
  #5  
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
 
SYMAWD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4,817
Likes: 0
Received 234 Likes on 171 Posts
Default

And for anyone wondering, there is no engine badging on the back.


Old 01-16-2017, 01:58 PM
  #6  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
Bozman5000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Tampa Bay Area
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I love the power in the 3.0. I recently found myself on a rural road with no buildings or traffic and brought it up to 103 in what seemed like a blink of an eye.

14.5 seconds to be exact.

2017 Audi Q7 3.0T vs. 2015 BMW X5 xDrive35i, 2015 Land Rover Range Rover Sport HSE, 2016 Volvo XC90 T6 AWD Inscription: Final Scoring, Performance Data, and Complete Specs

Last edited by Bozman5000; 01-16-2017 at 02:34 PM.
Old 01-16-2017, 03:56 PM
  #7  
AudiWorld Member
 
luv2sleep's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: SoCal
Posts: 509
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

The 2.0T can be fine for some. I'm guessing that folks who can't afford (or don't want to fork out the extra cash) the 3.0T but want a Q7 will be the ones eyeing the 2.0T. I personally won't ever buy a underpowered car, not even a family hauler/SUV. It's all fun and games until you're trying to climb a hill/mountain with a full load on a hot summer day. Nothing more frustrating than putzing along wishing for more power. Life is too short.
Old 01-16-2017, 04:23 PM
  #8  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
Dasaint's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Rain City Seattle
Posts: 1,068
Received 44 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

I drove my Q today on dynamic for the first time and I was all grins. The engine sounds so good and it moves with great authority. With that being said I drove an A6 with the 2.0 and was impressed. I'm sure the 2.0 will be adequate for most
Old 01-16-2017, 04:30 PM
  #9  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
farmerjones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,174
Likes: 0
Received 152 Likes on 103 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BigKutta
A 4 cylinder is just not adequate in this size/class.
Everyone has different expectations, and not all 4 cylinders are created equal. Volvo can't seem to meet production demands after a full year of 7 passenger AWD XC90s with only a 4 cylinder Maybe 10 years ago you could make a blanket statement about 4 cylinders, but now days many 4 cylinders put out V8 power from only a few years ago.... Technology sure has changed. But I'm with you...the 3.0T motor is too sweet to not go for in the Q7. Will be interesting to see how many 2.0Ts they can sell in the product mix.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RJC 1
Audi Q8
18
11-02-2019 07:40 PM
RJC 1
Q7 MKII Discussion
8
11-19-2018 08:32 AM
vince.quaranto
Performance and Tuning
1
09-29-2017 09:08 PM
S4 111
S4 (B6 & B7 Platforms) Discussion
16
09-22-2005 12:45 PM
AJN334
S4 / RS4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
1
02-27-2005 02:33 PM



Quick Reply: Q7 2.0t First Impressions



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:02 AM.