Alignment margin of error...
Anyway, so I went in for the alignment. Didn't really like the printout based on what I wanted so we put it up on the rack again and a completely different set of measurements (actually what I wanted) show up. This was a Hunter system and I watched the tech put the wheel systems on. He did a good job. So I'm left with a conclusion that at such small angles of measurment these systems lack good calibration and may not have repeatable results.
I'm interested in any BTDT where you had to re-rack the car and if the previous measurment aligned (ha!) with the current.
Maybe I just need to go to a different shop with newer/cleaner equipment.
However the car feels like it has close to zero toe in the front, it's very neutral, camber measures out at -1.1 in the front and -1.4 in the rear with rear total toe at 0 with one side -0.04 and the other at +0.04. That was after the second time up.
In any event, the scales will be at the at the Auto-x this weekend and I'll see what it measures out at to start.
Back to the original question though... the data you have and I presume eveyone else has is the "final" printout of alignment. The quesiton is, if you drove around the block and put it back up on the alignment rack, would those measurements repeat?
I'll go to another shop and see what they measure it out at. And compare where shop one says it is and shop two says. I think a lot depends on calibrating the equipment which likely is not within the avergae tech's capability.
So far, I've been to two "highly recommended" shops and neither one has done a good job.
Trending Topics
Since I have a scale, I can tell you that there is not much I can do suspension wise to get this close to 50/50. It will be done by moving weight around.
On the other hand, having the right spring rates and shock dampening go a long way more than corner balancing, at least for most street coilovers available I've seen.
Bringing Audi to Life for Audi Fans




