APR S3 question....seems some are stating 350whp....didn't APR claim 383crank??>>>
11-30-2005, 04:43 PM
#24
That's exactly why you should ignore that number....Duh....>
And I doubt you'll ever see that put in print anywhere from APR. Just part of the testing. Easier to figure losses in 2wd than 4 for calculating crank HP I'll bet. Look at some of the really poor numbers that come out of Quattro cars...Haldex + Dyno is not a good combo
11-30-2005, 04:46 PM
#25
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Repeat... I have fun driving the TT, not the Dyno Graph, I have fun driving, not the Dyno... >
or visit ;-P<ul><li><a href="http://forums.vwvortex.com/zeroforum?id=27">http://forums.vwvortex.com/zeroforum?id=27</a</li></ul>
11-30-2005, 04:47 PM
#26
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,881
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
oh man...kids! meaning me? top dog? Check out the stuff from HPA or go Jap...>>
To worry about being top dog when I merely hope to keep up with stock M3's is a little funny...don't you think?
I'm glad APR has their kit. Doesn't make my car any less enjoyable to drive.
I'm glad APR has their kit. Doesn't make my car any less enjoyable to drive.
11-30-2005, 05:23 PM
#30
Keep up? I still think you have a larger area under your torque curve between gears...
than any stock e46 M3. In other words, I still think you will blow them away.
On the other hand, I had experienced being blown away by an e46 M3. I think it's my 2nd loss ever from a stop to about 60+. 1st one was with a WS6 Firbird, although I didn't really see his taillights
On the other hand, I had experienced being blown away by an e46 M3. I think it's my 2nd loss ever from a stop to about 60+. 1st one was with a WS6 Firbird, although I didn't really see his taillights