Even though the decision was made a coupe of weeks ago this is news of a sort...
#1
Even though the decision was made a coupe of weeks ago this is news of a sort...
... <font color="003366">the PSK in Ingolstadt approved S versions (as in S3, S4, S6, S8 not that S-Line stuff) of the next generation TT coupe and roadster. These will use an all-aluminum 2.0L turbocharged 16-valve FSI four-cylinder that is good for 280PS in Euro 4 emissions trim.
S models come out about a year after the next gen-car goes on sale. This is for the European market at the moment. Don't know if the model will be merchandised in North America.
Just though you'd appreciate the update.</font>
S models come out about a year after the next gen-car goes on sale. This is for the European market at the moment. Don't know if the model will be merchandised in North America.
Just though you'd appreciate the update.</font>
#4
Yep. Two reasons both interrelated. First, they're committed to direct-injection...
...<font color="003366"> technology for gasoline-fueled engines. Packaging the injector in a 5-valve design compromised the valve size and placement enough where the flow was no better than a good 4-valve arrangement. Still more costly but with no payoff.
Emissions, specifically Euro 4 emissions, are easier to meet with the 4-valve setup. So bye-bye 20v.</font>
Emissions, specifically Euro 4 emissions, are easier to meet with the 4-valve setup. So bye-bye 20v.</font>
#5
even more interesting
Audi and VW always played up the 5v/cylinder technology as being cleaner. It seems that 4v is actually cleaner...strange.
Does this also mean that the current 1.8t will be the last of the 5v engines?
Does this also mean that the current 1.8t will be the last of the 5v engines?
#6
It's beginning to look that way what with the 3.2L becoming the replacement...
... <font color="003366">for the remaining 2.8L and 3.0L 90° V6 gasoline engines at Audi and VW.</font>
Trending Topics
#8
I think that the 5v technology was a "fad" of sorts among many of the automakers...
While initially they found a lot of benefit... overall, I think that it proved to be more costly, and also more flow could be had from 4 valves.
#10
Really... that part of it I didn't know...
I remember when Mercedes was leading the charge on how much superior 5 valve technology was when they had introduced it on their 500 engines initially on the SL, when peak HP dropped from 318 to 302.. most people couldn't understand that.