TT (Mk1) Discussion Discussion forum for the Mk1 Audi TT Coupe & Roadster produced from 2000-2006

Oh man!!!!!! ...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-17-2002, 12:30 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
sofTTware's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Oh man!!!!!! ...

First official info on the next gen. S4!<ul><li><a href="https://www.audiworld.com/news/02/new_s4/">New S4</a></li></ul>
Old 09-17-2002, 12:32 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
TTigg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default very dissapointing if you ask me, hate the re-design

looks, well not sure really. I would have thought they were going to stick with current new A4 design but it just looks way different.

I think a lot of people will be keeping there S4s and going the RS4 conversion route. I would if I had one. Saw a Nog blue one recently - truly awesome looking
Old 09-17-2002, 12:32 PM
  #3  
AudiWorld Super User
 
joe@vwvortex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 13,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Not impressed at all.........

3700lbs? Yikes! Hopefully we'll get the new RS4 which should have decent performance.
Old 09-17-2002, 12:33 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
ND4SPD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,949
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Um, can you say SCREWED! What happened to the RS6 engine? That is what should be in there.
Old 09-17-2002, 12:38 PM
  #5  
New Member
 
jhood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 300+ hp and it's that slow????.......

damn, a Mustang GT with a whole lot less hp is as fast? So where is th technology????? With that hp it should be 0-60 in under 5 sec. (I realize the time given is 0-100km).
Old 09-17-2002, 12:40 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
ND4SPD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,949
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Heavy, Quattro, etc. But you are right, the #'s are sad for that...

But then again most Euro cars are better once they get going. Take an SL500. 0-60 6.1 est. But on the highway, those things are beasts.
Old 09-17-2002, 12:43 PM
  #7  
Elder Member
 
RTinNYC(again)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 13,206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well it weighs as much a beluga whale, that never seems to help anything...
Old 09-17-2002, 12:46 PM
  #8  
AudiWorld Super User
 
Jim TT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 6,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I like it, a NA V8 is a nice way to go. JIM
Old 09-17-2002, 01:01 PM
  #9  
Junior Member
 
4SFEDTT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 844
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default For once I'm not impressed by Audi...

Not sure what to say.
I'd much rather see Audi raise the bar on performance sedans rather then play catch up.

E46 M3 has been out now for well over a year. Doesn't anyone think this was enough time for Audi to develop a proper S4 to topple that?!

I know that no official performance stats have been released, but 3,600lbs+ car and 344hp with the added bonus of a Quattro drive loss doesn't equal an M3 killer.

A fine car it will be regardless, but certainly not the formula I had envisioned for it to make BMW nervous at the knees. Sorry to see the 2.7T go.
Old 09-17-2002, 01:03 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
ND4SPD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,949
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Not to mention that BMW and Mercedes will have something new by then.

And Mercedes can go to Renntech, and still have a warranty and be taked to the dealer.


Quick Reply: Oh man!!!!!! ...



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:56 PM.