PIC of Milltek 3.2 Catback...
#1
PIC of Milltek 3.2 Catback...
<center><img src="http://www.stratmosphere.com/tt_32_mtk_catback.jpg"></center><p>Got a new pic of the system itself. We have these in stock now and so far the owners have been really happy with the systems. $1095. -Pete, Stratmosphere<ul><li><a href="http://www.stratmosphere.com/milltek_tt_exhaust.htm">Milltek TT 3.2 Catback</a></li></ul>
#7
I have this and it is great. The sound is awesome, and the fit and finish is prefect
As for HP, yes it does feel quicker, will have to get it dynoed to really see. In comparing the new exhaust to the old you can see how and why the air flow is much better.
Trending Topics
#8
off topic - I knew I had seen the "hand thing" somewhere before...
I got an email about the ...one in the stank maneuver...people must have time on their hands to think up this stuff.
I am curious, what all are you doing to your car - even the door had to come off!
I am curious, what all are you doing to your car - even the door had to come off!
#10
A Few Questions...
1) How much weight savings is this system over the stock system?
2a) What difference(s) should one expect when buying the resonating system over the non-resonating system?
2b) For instance, is it simply just a louder raspy-sounding exhaust with the resonator?
3) Is the performance increase** dyno proven?
**I calculate:
7-8% increase in HP @flywheel = ~268 HP
6-7% increase in TQ @flywheel = ~250 LB-FT
2a) What difference(s) should one expect when buying the resonating system over the non-resonating system?
2b) For instance, is it simply just a louder raspy-sounding exhaust with the resonator?
3) Is the performance increase** dyno proven?
**I calculate:
7-8% increase in HP @flywheel = ~268 HP
6-7% increase in TQ @flywheel = ~250 LB-FT