TT (Mk1) Discussion Discussion forum for the Mk1 Audi TT Coupe & Roadster produced from 2000-2006

PIC of Milltek 3.2 Catback...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-03-2004, 06:53 AM
  #1  
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
 
Pete @ Stratmosphere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 3,759
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default PIC of Milltek 3.2 Catback...

<center><img src="http://www.stratmosphere.com/tt_32_mtk_catback.jpg"></center><p>Got a new pic of the system itself. We have these in stock now and so far the owners have been really happy with the systems. $1095. -Pete, Stratmosphere<ul><li><a href="http://www.stratmosphere.com/milltek_tt_exhaust.htm">Milltek TT 3.2 Catback</a></li></ul>
Old 05-03-2004, 06:59 AM
  #2  
Member
 
02TTK04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Why would anyone replace that great exhaust that comes stock on the 3.2?
Old 05-03-2004, 07:10 AM
  #3  
AudiWorld Super User
 
JustJeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 21,754
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

better air flow.
Old 05-03-2004, 07:15 AM
  #4  
Member
 
02TTK04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Reviews have been that the 3.2 exhaust is very well designed to start with and has a great balance

of back pressure and flow.
Old 05-03-2004, 07:15 AM
  #5  
Member
 
AxeYrCat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 15,536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

people used to say that about 2.8 vr6 exhausts as well. ;-)
Old 05-03-2004, 07:17 AM
  #6  
Member
 
RedRoadster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default $1100 for a catback on a normally-aspirated car; that will be the most expensive handful of HP

anyone ever buys, LOL.
Old 05-03-2004, 07:29 AM
  #7  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
watty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,903
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default I have this and it is great. The sound is awesome, and the fit and finish is prefect

As for HP, yes it does feel quicker, will have to get it dynoed to really see. In comparing the new exhaust to the old you can see how and why the air flow is much better.
Old 05-03-2004, 07:33 AM
  #8  
AudiWorld Super User
 
QS -'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 15,956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default off topic - I knew I had seen the "hand thing" somewhere before...

I got an email about the ...one in the stank maneuver...people must have time on their hands to think up this stuff.

I am curious, what all are you doing to your car - even the door had to come off!
Old 05-03-2004, 07:38 AM
  #9  
Member
 
hoTTub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 17,278
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

yeah, but if it costs $1095 it must add HP right?
Old 05-03-2004, 07:46 AM
  #10  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
GermanCarBuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 999
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default A Few Questions...

1) How much weight savings is this system over the stock system?

2a) What difference(s) should one expect when buying the resonating system over the non-resonating system?
2b) For instance, is it simply just a louder raspy-sounding exhaust with the resonator?

3) Is the performance increase** dyno proven?

**I calculate:
7-8% increase in HP @flywheel = ~268 HP
6-7% increase in TQ @flywheel = ~250 LB-FT


Quick Reply: PIC of Milltek 3.2 Catback...



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:02 PM.