GaryJ

Stage 1?, Stage 2?, Stage 3?<br>Who can I take, and who can take me?<br>0-60?<br>1/4 mile?<br>50-70?<p>Slow work day forces questions like these to pop into my head.<p>GaryJ

GaryJ

Thats &quot;take&quot; not &quot;taks&quot; as in go faster than.

MartinR

All things being equal, the 1.8T weighs about 175lbs less - should be easily faster in 0-60<br>1/4 mile etc. Depends on what chip/ tires etc etc of course.

Christian J. Long

The stock 2.8 30v does 0-60 in 7.0 or 7.1 seconds...right?<p>My A4 turbo Neuspeed .8 bar could take you, since I am recording 0-60 times in the 6.9 second range. But, I don't have a sunroof or Quattro....so my car is a lightweight 2994 pounds (I weighed it). A loaded quattro turbo will be around 300 pounds or more heavier, so you would be even with it i bet.<p>Now, i have seen people on this board with 1.0 bar chips get down in the mid 6 second range and sometimes lower.<p>Remember, the 2.8 engine weighs more than the 1.8t, so they have a weight advantage.<p>Christian J. Long<br>hit and run violated A4 1.8t

Geza

Also, 1.8TQ has shorter gearing than 2.8Q

Robert ill

Said one anonymous 2.8 driver, "oh, those were your DTM tips pulling away from me on the straights" at ThunderHill.<p>Robbie<br>991.8Tqms, TAPII, Scorpion<br>

Oscar

the chipped 1.8T's and the chipped 2.8's were (both pulling away from my non-chipped 1.8T) pretty even in the straight away.<p>Oscar <br>97.5 A4 1.8TQM

Andrew C.

with the weight advantage to the 1.8T, I'd say it'd take the stock 2.8. Not by much though.<p>Andrew<br>98.5 2.8qms

Christian J. Long

And, doesn't the Q have shorter gearing than FWD?

AntonC

Click on "Press".<ul><li><a href="http://www.chip-tuning.com/usa/main/mainmenu.html">Stock 2.8 30V vs. Stock 1.8T vs. 1.8T + chip</a></li></ul>