Starting to look at D4’s - pano roof reliability?
#1
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
Starting to look at D4’s - pano roof reliability?
Multiple D2’s, D3 and I suppose a D4 is on deck (my A5 experiment is not working out so well). I’m starting to look around and really like the pano roof option. I’m getting really mixed reviews though fon the general idea but not necessarily Audi specific. General complaints seem to be squeaks, leaking and high heat. I can live with the addl heat but squeaks/higher noise level will drive me crazy.
What’s the general consensus on the D4’s in this area?
thanks
What’s the general consensus on the D4’s in this area?
thanks
#2
AudiWorld Member
Got the pano roof. No complaints at all.
There was a recall some months ago to replace all the rubber seals so no squeaks nor leaks.
For the heat you have the electric shades on both.
There was a recall some months ago to replace all the rubber seals so no squeaks nor leaks.
For the heat you have the electric shades on both.
Last edited by laurent0613; 03-06-2019 at 10:38 AM.
#4
#6
AudiWorld Super User
S8 has the std. (short wheelbase) roof, but no mechanical issues there. On D3 sunroof (pre-pano design), only issue over life of car has been the motor that raises and lowers the wind flap. Replaced it myself. Closing the sun shade reduces noise at highway speeds some, both on the D3 W12 and the D4 S8. Both already have acoustic glass too, so are generally very quiet compared to most vehicles.
Q5 has pano roof--somewhat more wind noise, but that is a more upright SUV design, has roof rails (no crossbars on ours) and is a generally cheaper B8 A5 design take off.
For roof heat, from having first done it on a pano Mini S, then the Q5, and more recently my std. sunroof D4 S8 and a Golf R, you can just get it tinted some if it is an issue in your climate. I used 70% (30 percent light reduction) high performance ceramic type film, which reduces the IR heat load about 50%. 3M Crystalline specifically. Went from feeling summer solar heat on my arm or thinning head to nothing. Darkening the roof a bit more made it easier on my no sunglasses eyes too.
Q5 has pano roof--somewhat more wind noise, but that is a more upright SUV design, has roof rails (no crossbars on ours) and is a generally cheaper B8 A5 design take off.
For roof heat, from having first done it on a pano Mini S, then the Q5, and more recently my std. sunroof D4 S8 and a Golf R, you can just get it tinted some if it is an issue in your climate. I used 70% (30 percent light reduction) high performance ceramic type film, which reduces the IR heat load about 50%. 3M Crystalline specifically. Went from feeling summer solar heat on my arm or thinning head to nothing. Darkening the roof a bit more made it easier on my no sunglasses eyes too.
Last edited by MP4.2+6.0; 03-06-2019 at 11:23 PM.
#7
D4 in PA
I used 70% (30 percent light reduction) high performance ceramic type film, which reduces the IR heat load about 50%. 3M Crystalline specifically. Went from feeling summer solar heat on my arm or thinning head to nothing. Darkening the roof a bit more made it easier on my no sunglasses eyes too.
Trending Topics
#8
I also had my windshield tinted with a "clear" ceramic tint to help cut the heat load within the car even further. It did make a difference, and you can't tell it's there at all...
#9
AudiWorld Super User
That's great news... I've been thinking of tinting my back window to reduce the baking effect, and will now add the sunroof to that. I believe 3M Crystalline also comes in a nearly-clear product to keep up with light reduction laws in some (including mine) states? The only thing that has stopped me is the potential for distortion when looking through the back glass.
I have used Crystalline 90 on one front window application, but otherwise use the 70. Some use it for front windows where they want tint to be hardly noticed. There is so much light from the sunroof in general, that honestly you don't notice much overall difference in appearance looking out. At first I was worried about that given glass already has the noticeable factory tint, but found the incremental difference small. I could almost argue for using their 50 frankly for it from my own results. I think 90 is used primarily for windshield tinting, which in CA is a big no no. I end up replacing most vehicle windshields I own once or twice anyway, so too much $$ there even if I could get past the other concerns there.
Last edited by MP4.2+6.0; 03-07-2019 at 07:47 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AutoUnionQ7
Q7 MK 1 Discussion
8
04-22-2008 04:24 AM
Dr Chill
Q7 MK 1 Discussion
5
11-16-2006 03:28 PM