17"? 18"? My guess is 18's!
#4
Those are not Hock R's...
They do look similar however...
Steve
Michigan<ul><li><a href="http://www.cheapwheels.com/xcart/customer/product.php?productid=1303&cat=&page=">htt p://www.cheapwheels.com/xcart/customer/product.php?productid=1303&cat=&page=</a</li></ul>
Steve
Michigan<ul><li><a href="http://www.cheapwheels.com/xcart/customer/product.php?productid=1303&cat=&page=">htt p://www.cheapwheels.com/xcart/customer/product.php?productid=1303&cat=&page=</a</li></ul>
#5
Sorry, but actually they are!
<center><img src="http://pictureposter.audiworld.com/81090/z.jpg"></center><p>But they are older design approxiamtely 5 years old.
Check my sig out or this pic.. I have a set on my Z. 16's -
Which, I purchased them myself years ago
I don't like the new design, looks cheap IMO
Check my sig out or this pic.. I have a set on my Z. 16's -
Which, I purchased them myself years ago
I don't like the new design, looks cheap IMO
#7
Well smarty...
if you look in the picture of the Audi you'll see that the ones pictured have a slight lip...
The Hocks pictured in 16x7.5 don't have that lip.
If the 17x8 do then fine.
Anyways, guess what? I really don't give a f@ck.
Steve
Michigan
The Hocks pictured in 16x7.5 don't have that lip.
If the 17x8 do then fine.
Anyways, guess what? I really don't give a f@ck.
Steve
Michigan
Trending Topics
#9
Re: Well smarty...
Hummn.
I figured that was due to the different spacing, backspacing to be exact creating a more negative offset than mine.
All rims will look different (ie. lips) with different spacing. Just imaging the old days when you put some 50's on the back of your chevelle, the fronts looked alot different with the 70's--no?
I figured that was due to the different spacing, backspacing to be exact creating a more negative offset than mine.
All rims will look different (ie. lips) with different spacing. Just imaging the old days when you put some 50's on the back of your chevelle, the fronts looked alot different with the 70's--no?