Took the S4 to the track.
#1
Took the S4 to the track.
Just wanted to get an idea but did not want to rag my car out. I launched at about 3,200 RPM's
R/T: .897
60': 1.898
330: 5.728
1/8: 8.856
1/4: 13.73
MPH: 101.39
R/T: .897
60': 1.898
330: 5.728
1/8: 8.856
1/4: 13.73
MPH: 101.39
#4
Here are my numbers...
My first run, with just catback was:
1/4 Mile ET: 13.710
1/4 Mile MPH: 100.450
1/8 Mile ET: 8.806
1/8 Mile MPH: 79.740
0-60 Foot ET: 1.916
I went back after the dp's and did:
13.5@102
1.8xx 60'. Don't have the slip on me. :-/
1/4 Mile ET: 13.710
1/4 Mile MPH: 100.450
1/8 Mile ET: 8.806
1/8 Mile MPH: 79.740
0-60 Foot ET: 1.916
I went back after the dp's and did:
13.5@102
1.8xx 60'. Don't have the slip on me. :-/
Trending Topics
#8
Oooh...your going to love 'em!!
My numbers don't really show what's capable of the dp's.
A quick low-down. The first time at the rock, with just the catback, my best was the 13.7 run. But I was averaging 13.9 and 14's. And even a few 14.1's and 14.2's. Really odd. I really think their timing is messed up.
Anyway, I went back with the dp's. That's when I got the 13.5. But I was averaging 13.6 and 13.7's. So I had a few tenths off on average, which is good. But I still think the car is capable of lower ET's.
A quick low-down. The first time at the rock, with just the catback, my best was the 13.7 run. But I was averaging 13.9 and 14's. And even a few 14.1's and 14.2's. Really odd. I really think their timing is messed up.
Anyway, I went back with the dp's. That's when I got the 13.5. But I was averaging 13.6 and 13.7's. So I had a few tenths off on average, which is good. But I still think the car is capable of lower ET's.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
primetime
S4 (B8 Platform) Discussion
31
11-22-2010 08:04 PM
primetime
S4 (B8 Platform) Discussion
32
11-10-2010 06:06 PM
eigenvector
S4 / RS4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
5
05-26-2006 01:07 PM
chili
S4 / RS4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
27
05-22-2002 03:07 PM
Jeremy Clarkson
S4 / RS4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
11
04-10-2002 11:52 AM