S4 (B9 Platform) Discussion Discussion forum for the B9 Audi S4 produced from 2016-

Audi S4 and S5 sales halted

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-10-2017, 02:42 PM
  #21  
Audiworld Junior Member
 
DillonM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Could someone explain what this means for someone that is about to pull the trigger on a car that's already at a lot in the U.S.?
Old 08-10-2017, 03:05 PM
  #22  
AudiWorld Member
 
Talbot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Mountain Brook, AL
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

In my opinion, nothing that should stop you from pulling the trigger.

I breaks down like this:
Maybe they will update the engine software here at some point in time. Maybe they won't.
If they do update the software, maybe it will provide an improvement to a parameter that's important to you... Maybe it won't.

There's little more than can be said about it, really.
Old 08-10-2017, 03:15 PM
  #23  
Audiworld Junior Member
 
DillonM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Talbot
In my opinion, nothing that should stop you from pulling the trigger.

I breaks down like this:
Maybe they will update the engine software here at some point in time. Maybe they won't.
If they do update the software, maybe it will provide an improvement to a parameter that's important to you... Maybe it won't.

There's little more than can be said about it, really.
So, worst case we take our cars in for a software update?
Old 08-10-2017, 03:20 PM
  #24  
AudiWorld Member
 
Talbot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Mountain Brook, AL
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Correct. You would be notified about the availability of said update via postal mail, more than likely.

If nothing else, it will certainly be discussed to death here.
Old 08-11-2017, 05:01 AM
  #25  
AudiWorld Super User
 
Glisse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 2,545
Received 491 Likes on 335 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Talbot
In my opinion, nothing that should stop you from pulling the trigger.

I breaks down like this:
Maybe they will update the engine software here at some point in time. Maybe they won't.
If they do update the software, maybe it will provide an improvement to a parameter that's important to you... Maybe it won't.

There's little more than can be said about it, really.
Good summation.

In Germany, any change to a regulatory specification requires re-certification of the vehicle. The software change is going to impact on the carbon dioxide emission specification, which is currently certified at 166g/km based on the EU6 drive cycle. It was reported that the change will be single digit level, which would mean the new figure will be somewhere between 167g/km and 175g/km.

These figures are meaningless to the US market, perhaps even more so in the current environment. Although carbon dioxide emissions are directly related to fuel consumption, so the consumption figure in the US may increase by around 0.2mpg or so, but I don't think this has any impact.

But the impact can be quite significant in some markets. By example, the UK (which is a similar size to the US for Audi) charges an annual vehicle tax based on CO2 emissions, with 13 scale levels. The current S4 at 166g/km would incur a tax of £500, if revised to 175g/km the tax would be £300 higher. So these numbers matter within a global market.

What is unknown at the moment is how real the proposed change is. It may be that the CO2 numbers certified for the S4 and S5 were too low for the typical weight of the cars, and Audi is nervous at a time when plenty of arrests are being made in Germany. I would like to think they are genuinely trying to improve the throttle response / transmission mapping behaviour to remove the strange lethargy in certain modes/situations, which is clearly efficiency related. But they did not do a stop sale on the SQ5, which uses the same engine and transmission. I have not driven an SQ5, so don't know how that feels. But from what I have read here, it is the same. The SQ5 has a much higher CO2 figure, due to its weight. To change the S4 and S5 ECU maps, but not the SQ5, makes me a little concerned as to what is really going on.

The positive aspect is if you already like the car, you like the car. If they do affect any real change, it is most unlikely you would like it less
Old 08-11-2017, 05:27 AM
  #26  
AudiWorld Member
 
Talbot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Mountain Brook, AL
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Glisse
To change the S4 and S5 ECU maps, but not the SQ5, makes me a little concerned as to what is really going on.

Maybe they're just staggering the change(s) so they don't have a complete production shutdown on everything with that engine? I'd sort of expect a slight variation in software between the 4/5 and the Q anyway.
Old 08-11-2017, 06:47 AM
  #27  
AudiWorld Member
 
mmorais's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Toronto
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Glisse
Good summation.


What is unknown at the moment is how real the proposed change is.

Good explanation.

I'm far less interested in the changes in emissions and certifications than I am in a verification of just what the updates they're doing are meant to address, who's going to get them and when?

Anyone know that beyond the marketing spin Audi has said about it?

I won't like my car any less with no change but I'd sure like it more if they fixed the responsiveness.

Last edited by mmorais; 08-11-2017 at 07:07 AM.
Old 08-11-2017, 07:05 AM
  #28  
AudiWorld Member
 
Damon44's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: S Florida
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmorais

I won't like my car any less with no change but I'd sure like it more if they fixed the responsiveness.
Geez isn't that the truth!
Gas is so cheap that performance is everything.
I can't imaging purchasing a BMW , MB or Audi and driving it in eco.
Like keeping one foot on the brake.
Old 08-11-2017, 07:15 AM
  #29  
AudiWorld Member
 
Talbot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Mountain Brook, AL
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Damon44
Gas is so cheap that performance is everything.
Apparently you haven't noticed the complaints in this very forum about actual gas mileage obtained vs what was put on the sticker.

But, yeah... I agree with you.
Old 08-11-2017, 07:16 AM
  #30  
AudiWorld Member
 
Spartan-S4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Damon44
Geez isn't that the truth!
Gas is so cheap that performance is everything.
I can't imaging purchasing a BMW , MB or Audi and driving it in eco.
Like keeping one foot on the brake.
Why not? It's one of the reasons they have the modes. If you're on a long highway commute and are traveling the country on vacation & have your family with you say wife/kids then D/Comfort makes complete sense to use.

The statement about can't imagining someone buying one of these cars and using D mode is just sorta closed minded. You're not the norm anymore. The norm are people who want the best of both worlds & that's what they car makers are shooting for/making.


Quick Reply: Audi S4 and S5 sales halted



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:17 AM.