Intercooler BT: best option for SMICs?
05-17-2006, 11:17 AM
#22
AudiWorld Super User
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i will post up when the prototypes are done and i can get some data on them
FWIW i dont really care what they will dyno (though they will see dyno time) i want to see real world numbers rowing through gears and such so that is what i will post.
05-17-2006, 11:17 AM
#23
Audiworld Sponsor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 19,700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If X = stock * 1.10 and Y = stock * 1.15 then Y > X.
I have no opinion of which of the three currently available SMICs is the best, but I think they are all close enough to eachother that it doesn't really matter.
-Dave Pramanik
-Dave Pramanik
05-17-2006, 11:18 AM
#24
AudiWorld Super User
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
no but you mentioned something that had to do with AWE/giac that makes you the antichrist
and tory has to hammer on you. shame on you J.... remember AWE is the devil, those who want to go to heaven must swing from the nuts of ASP or at least be against AWE and everything they stand for.
05-17-2006, 11:22 AM
#26
AudiWorld Super User
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
imho i think IATs are still too high at this point in time. its a shame that damn AC canister is
such a PITA to relocate. i dont even think our upgraded intercoolers are as big as supra stockers.
05-17-2006, 11:24 AM
#28
AudiWorld Super User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 7,176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I ended up going with AWE just because of what was available when I got them.
Both are much better than stock, and I think either choice (I haven't seen enough data from Silvas to include them, but I guess they'd also work too) would be fine.
