TT (Mk1) Discussion Discussion forum for the Mk1 Audi TT Coupe & Roadster produced from 2000-2006

Defcon 1+ alignment question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-22-2007, 07:12 AM
  #1  
AudiWorld Member
Thread Starter
 
TTinWV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Defcon 1+ alignment question

Now that I've got the Defcon 1+ installed, I need to have the car aligned (stock suspension + H&R sway on soft setting).

From what I've read, here are the targets:

Front:
Camber: -0.8deg
Cross Camber: 0deg
Caster: (not adjustable)
Toe: Toe IN (per side) 0 to 1/32" (I want this closer to 0 than the stock specification, right?)
Total Toe: 0 to 1/16"
Steering Angle: 0deg

Rear:
Camber: -1.6deg
Cross Camber: 0deg
Toe: Toe IN (per side) - 0 to 1/16"
Total Toe: 0 to 1/8"
Thrust Angle: 0deg

Which, I think, are mostly stock specs, with the exception of reducing the front toe in. Does this sound right or am I missing something?

Thanks.
Old 02-22-2007, 08:02 AM
  #2  
Member
 
TToplessTTs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default The problem with the front toe is...

0 toe is great for track use, but on the street you'll find that the car won't track straight. If you let loose of the wheel the car will just drive itself in whichever direction is chooses to go. I would use a slight toe-in on the front unless you only track the car.
Old 02-22-2007, 09:40 AM
  #3  
AudiWorld Super User
 
Russ Scott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,082
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Does this sound right or am I missing something?

Nope, IMO you're not missing anything. These specs are similar to stock, with the exception of cross camber. The factory allows too much. The car's response to steering input (from the perspective of precision), it's tendancy to wander and pull, and the way it enters and exits corners at speed all benefit from matching the camber from side to side. It takes a little longer to get zero, rather than allowing .3 or more mismatch, and it's a worthwhile investment. The remainder of the specs (toe and the basic camber setting) have all been experimented with incrementally in my shop and others. An interesting pattern has emerged over time: these numbers, which resemble the factory spec, WORK the best.
There are exceptions in use. For example: much higher front camber combined with more toe in produces lightning fast turn in. Toe out in front increases grip. But there's usually a trade off. Some other handling characteristic suffers, or tire wear increases dramatically. If you have the tools and the time to experiment with this stuff, it's pretty interesting.
If not, use the best alignment guy you can find, and request these specs. They balance all of the variables the best, and the car handles really well in daily use.
Old 02-22-2007, 10:30 AM
  #4  
AudiWorld Member
Thread Starter
 
TTinWV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks, I'll shoot for these specs.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
yetiking303
Audi 90 / 80 / Coupe quattro / Cabriolet
0
07-07-2009 11:12 AM
pointby
A4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
18
09-26-2005 07:28 PM
BullBear
S4 / RS4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
3
05-16-2003 07:48 AM
brianking67
A4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
2
12-20-2002 11:39 AM
PhoenixGTS
S4 / RS4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
1
04-14-2002 03:26 PM



Quick Reply: Defcon 1+ alignment question



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:52 PM.